203-423-5246
Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page
Get your custom sample essay

Critical summary of nathaniel currier s

Tea Party

APUSH Collateral: An engineering marvel is a Happiness Forever

We will write a custom essay on On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on t specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

The Break down of Tea at Boston Harbor was lithographed back in 1846 by the company Currier and Ives, and the musician of the artwork was Nathaniel Currier. Nathaniel was born in Roxbury, Ma on Mar 27th, 1813. His father and mother were Nathaniel and Hannah Currier, who had been distant cousins. When Nathaniel was eight years old, his father died leaving eight year-old Nathaniel and his 11 year-old older brother Lorenzo to aid their younger six year-old sister At the and two year-old buddy Charles (Cunningham). He spent his period doing little random job in order to give the family, however when having been fifteen, this individual apprenticed in the Boston lithography shop of William and John Pendleton, who were the first effective lithographers in the us (Lebeau). In 1835 Currier managed to create his own lithography business, Currier Ives, which is what created his legacy.

The subject of the painting, The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor, is the throwing of tea into the normal water by men dressed as Indians. The painting likewise shows various other colonists entertaining these men on as they dump the tea in the harbor. The purpose of this kind of piece of work should be to portray the rebellion in the colonists by England during the time preceding the American Innovation. Interestingly enough, this lithograph was the only prewar event of the Innovation that the firm Currier and Ives made a decision to illustrate (Lebeau 52). His tone in the painting means that he favorite the settlers since the portrait portrays the colonists while having complete control over the case. The attitude of Currier in his painting is a confident one, which may be supported by the fact that this individual portrays the colonists in a decent fashion cheering for the organized damage of tea. Even individuals who are destroying the tea are most often calm and their actions are well organized as they drop entire chests of tea in Boston Possess. Currier’s attitude revealed inside the depiction of the event gives the impression that that the rebels were justified in the dumping of the tea into the possess, showing his optimistic opinions concerning the Boston Tea Party. His great view with the event is definitely biased because he was an apprentice to a Boston lithographer, and this individual grew up during a time in which the city a new revived attitude towards the tea action (Young 184). One other factor to consider was that Currier was creating this painting in order to sell it to other Americans, which could likewise possibly influence his hopeful portrayal on this event. The painting only includes American colonists and neglects to show any United kingdom influence at all, even though a firsthand bank account from George Robert A dozen Hewes, a shoemaker by Boston whom participated inside the Boston Tea Party, stated, “We were surrounded by United kingdom armed ships” (Young 30). This piece of art was recognized at its as well as was people paid several years at the Currier Ives retail outlet located in New York City, and was sold simply by peddlers throughout the country (Young 184).

The event represented in the piece of art is known today as the Boston Tea Party. On December 16th, 1773, a group of Bostonians protested the monopoly on American tea importation recently granted by Parliament to the East India Firm, and grabbed 342 chests of tea in a midnight raid in three tea ships and threw these people into the harbor (Kennedy and Cohen 121). Nathaniel Currier’s lithograph would not accurately display the events of the Boston Tea Party. The painting simply includes two ships, even so there were basically three boats that were raided, the Dartmouth, Eleanor plus the Beaver (Destruction of English East India Company Tea). Hewes says, “We were then ordered by each of our commander to spread out the hatches and take out all the boxes of tea and put them overboard, and we instantly proceeded to execute his orders, initial cutting and splitting the chests devoid of tomahawks, as a way thoroughly to expose them to the consequences of the water” (Young 30). The picture reveals a different account, and the rebels onboard the ship are shown throwing entire boxes of tea into the marine, not reducing open the chests and emptying all of them, which is what Hewes promises to have occurred. Hewes as well claims in the story that people were aiming to escape with stolen tea, however the portrait shows that each of the colonists were in support of the destruction of tea and does not suggest that there are any colonists trying to run away with virtually any stolen tea. Currier’s lithograph doesn’t fail at portraying the events with the Boston Tea party, yet , it is a bit distorted from your truth.

A modern time issue that relates to the Boston Tea Party is definitely the formation with the Tea Party Movement. The Tea Get together movement is definitely an extremist right wing party. They desire almost no federal government, no federal government taxes, and sometimes include Christian ideologies in their social concepts. It is regarded as a lawn roots movements, which means that the “ordinary people” started that, but now billionaires trying to make a profit, are eventually the ones funding it. The Tea Get together believes in the acronym TEA, meaning Taxed Enough Currently. They want to lower almost all federal government programs in order that there would be nothing to pay. What this means is no social security, not any DEP, without Medicare/Medicaid, and in addition they strongly go against sb/sth ? disobey Obamacare. Even though the Tea Party Movement is similar to the Boston Tea Party in the sense that they can both require no taxation, the Tea Party Movement’s ideals might ultimately hurt the nation by simply removing the important federal courses that many citizens need in order to survive.

Prev post Next post