I. Examination of Factors
The story’s two main characters are considered as a stereotype personality. Their roles were very easily known as the publisher clearly talked about their parts and physiognomies in the account. The story’s protagonist is Maître Hauchecome. He was mistakenly accused intended for stealing a pocketbook with five hundred tendu and some organization papers. Each time people found him, they will harassed him. He can end up being a powerful character. Via being a guaranteed innocent man, he was suddenly ruined by simply injustice.
Another personality is Maître Malandain. He was certainly referred to as the antagonist of the story when the author stated that he was the enemy of Maître Hauchecome and when this individual even said the mayor that Maître Hauchecome was the one who stole the wallet. Lastly, having been the reason for the ruined lifestyle of Maître Hauchecome.
Small Characters were seen in the storyplot. They are the gran, Maître Authirne, tavern owner and a horse dealer, Maître Fortune, owner with the pocketbook, and Marius Paumelle, the one who also found the leather pocketbook.
These characters are all deemed a flat character for they would not change everywhere over the story.
The issues used by mcdougal in the story were person vs . gentleman and guy vs . contemporary society. Man or man happened when Maître Hauchecome was accused so you can get the black leather wallet containing five-hundred francs and some business paperwork by his enemy – Maître Malandain. Another turmoil shown was man or society. Staying unaware, people around him still alleged him although the husbandman in Ymanville currently returned the pocketbook.
C. Point of View
The story is definitely uttered in Third Person Point of View because the narrator from the story is definitely not a figure in the story. Furthermore, the narrator is definitely an incomer who recognizes the mind of the characters. He inquired:
“Is Maître Hauchecome of Breaute here? “
Maître Hauchecome, sitting at the other end of the desk, replied: “Here I are. “
And the police officer resumed:
“Maître Hauchecome, will you have the goodness to accompany me personally to the mayor’s office? The mayor wish to talk to you. “
II. Discussion of the Theme
1 . You can never be innocent once if you’re accused
As rumors are easily pass on nowadays, people will just judge the way they think about you without knowing the fact. No matter how you deeply explain, you will continually be thought of as guilty. And if you are already free of the indictment, it is impossible that people is going to rapidly neglect what you acquired undergone. When Maître Hauchecome was wrongly accused of stealing even though of picking up the thread, everyone thought that he was a rascal. After the accusation, people overlooked him, and even if the pocketbook had been returned. 2 . How culture can be vicious
In life, when you’re supposed, people with you will always find a way to have negative thoughts about you. They quickly believe in what others state and they will not really care about how you will feel. Regarding Maître Hauchecome, he was wrongly alleged by his adversary of getting the pocketbook. People disbelieved him as he said that he was certainly not the robber. And when the pocketbook was returned by a man, the society still thought that he previously an accessary who went back it.
burgh- a borough or chartered community
swerved- diverged; veered
throng- a large, compressed crowd of folks or pets
savage- fierce, violent, and uncontrolled
rheumatism- any disease marked by inflammation and pain inside the joints
muscles, or fibrous muscle exasperated- infuriated; maddened
protruded- jutted; projected
jovialness- gifted with or perhaps characterized by a hearty, wondrous humor or a spirit of good-fellowship threshold- a tape of real wood, metal, or stone building the bottom of your doorway and crossed in entering a home or space. perplexed- mixed up; puzzled
4. Figures of Speech
1 . Representation
“Their blouses, green, “stiff-starched, ” shining as if varnished, ornamented with a little design and style in white-colored at the throat and arms, puffed about their bony body, seemed like balloons ready to bring them away. ” installment payments on your Consonance
“Maître Hauchecome was seized with a sort of disgrace to be seen hence by his enemy, picking a bit of string out of the dirt and grime. ” 3. Litotes
“What grieved me a whole lot was not the thing itself as the lying. There is practically nothing so shameful as to end up being placed under a cloud because of a lie. ” some. Hyperbole
“He went home uncomfortable and indignant, choking with anger and confusion, the greater dejected that he was capable, with his Grettle cunning, of doing what they had accused him of and ever offering of it as of a good switch. ” five. Appositive
“The next day about one o’clock in the afternoon Marius Paumelle, a employed man inside the employ of Maître Breton, husbandman at Ymanville, returned the wallet and its material to Maître Houlbreque of Manneville. “
V. Examination of Fictional Devices
1 . Flashback
“I was found, me? Who says he found me? “
“Monsieur Malandain, the harness developer. “
The old person remembered, understood and purged with anger.
Flashback was provided when Maître Hauchecome tried to recall time when Chriatian Malandain was looking at him while he was picking up the piece of thread. 2 . Symbolism
“In the public sq of Goderville there was a crowd, a throng of human beings and family pets mixed jointly. The sides of the cattle, the tall hats, with firm nap, from the rich peasant and the headgear of the peasant women rose above the surface of the assembly. And the clamorous, shrill, yelling voices manufactured a continuous and savage noise which sometimes was dominated by the strong lungs of some countryman’s laugh and also the long lowing of a cow tied to the wall of the house. “
Imagery was shown because the author could let the viewers imagine the actual place of Goderville by allowing them to have the visual image of it. The lines made the readers feel as if these people were present in the actual moment, proper between the lines. 3. Puzzle
“Is Maître Hauchecome of Breaute here? “
Maître Hauchecome, placed at the other end of the desk, replied: “Here I was. “
And the expert resumed:
“Maître Hauchecome, will you have goodness to accompany me personally to the mayor’s office? The mayor wish to talk to you. “
Suspense was seen because the author effectively let the reader question regarding the things may happen next. Intense feeling was also present to the readers as they wait for what to you suppose will happen to Hauchecome, and as they ask so why he was known as by the gran. 4. Chekhov’s Gun
“Maître Hauchecome of Breaute acquired just attained Goderville, and he was leading his methods toward people square if he perceived upon the ground just a little piece of thread. Maître Hauchecome, economical such as a true Norman, thought that almost everything useful should be picked up, and he curled painfully, intended for he suffered from rheumatism. He took the small amount of slim cord from the ground and began to roll it carefully”
By the time Hauchecome indexed the chain, it seems like they have nothing to do with the account. But it started to be noteworthy towards middle of the account because it was the reason why he was blamed intended for stealing because Malandain told the mayor a different story about the thing Hauchecome picked up. your five. Asyndeton
“The women, having placed their particular great baskets at all their feet, had taken out the poultry which in turn lay upon the ground, linked together by the feet, with terrified sight and scarlet crests. “
The queue shows Asyndeton as the writer only utilized comma to have continuous movement of thoughts which boosts the tempo of the passage, and to have more memorable ideas.
1 ) Eagerness
Throughout the account, eagerness was evidently seen in the character of Hauchecome. When he was charged because of the wrong statement said by Malandain, people around him beleaguered and disbelieved him. He was very desperate to prove to the people that he was innocent. So when he understood about the returned budget, he possibly spread it to some unknown people just to verify his chasteness. 2 . Cynicism
This value was definitely exposed when ever Hauchecome, blamed for thieving the budget, was supposed by the world even though they did not understand the truth. Suspicion was displayed by the persons around him. They failed to give Hauchecome a chance to defend his chasteness, instead they criticized him. He as well experienced racism as those say bad comments to him.
VII. Social Significance
“You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people, and also you shall not operate against the life of your neighbors: I was the Lord. ” -Leviticus 19: 16
Connecting to the verse, we have to know how to love others, as we are called daughters of Goodness. We ought not to accuse others for the sins they may have committed since we do not know what their reasons really are. Overpowering to people may already trigger us to commit bad thing.
In our culture, we frequently hear persons around all of us talking about somebody else. Judging all of them immediately how they act. Specifically to young adults, they criticize persons they don’t like. They don’t know that what they are doing has already been considered as a great iniquity. Furthermore, we can observe that injustice is often happening in our country. Some delinquents are certainly not being reprimanded by the legislation just because they have the power and definitely, the money.
In summary, we have to learn to accept the some weakness of others and we must not benefit from it. Finally, we should not really be the reason for the downfall of others.
VIII. Comprehension Response
1 . Can be Hauchecome really an ignorant or a great innocent gentleman? Why?
In my opinion, Hauchecome is more of the ignorant man. He simply went to Goderville without knowing that he will manage to meet his misfortune right now there. He was as well ignorant in the case he was thought even though having been not the main one who stole the budget. He was uninformed that his enemy previously disgraced him. And by enough time the wallet was went back, people in the surroundings even now talked lurking behind his back negatively. installment payments on your Who do you consider should be blamed for the death of Hauchecome? He, himself or the society? So why?
For me, both he plus the society must be blamed to get his fatality. He, him self should be blamed since this individual let the people around him affect him. He must have ignored these people for he knew to himself that he was blameless. He wasn’t able to remain strong when folks tried to accuse him.
Additionally, society also needs to be responsible for his death as they were the explanation for the weak point of Hauchecome. They kept on saying poor ideas to him which built him feebler and made him feel never to fight anymore. 3. How can the story mirror the problem of social injustice-its victim and its proliferators?
Appertaining to the story, Hauchecome was blamed intended for the crime he would not do. People easily judged him despite the fact that they did certainly not know the truth. Towards the end of the story, he was continue to not offered any rights.
This decorative mirrors the problem with the society where justice is not being sensible. Some bad guys are faraway from penalties, as the innocent folks are being penalized and are turning into the patients. People quickly believe in gossip and give accusations immediately devoid of asking for the true story.
1Get your custom Essay