Excerpt from Term Paper:
Creating an efficient library social network platform must start with a view of how to create a content management system (CMS) first (Dickson, Holley, 2010). The CMS serves as the device of record of all directory and collection items, rendering valuable stats on how each book, content and collection item is being used (Shapira, Zabar, 2011). This is really valuable data for each office in the collection to better prepare how they are utilizing the content and managing choices. In front of the CMS, there are a variety of user extrémité available that resemble Facebook or myspace and also have messages capabilities similar to Twitter. An outstanding CMS will likely have the ability level to each in the core technology included in Appendix A, offering a solid foundation pertaining to communication and collaboration the two between the library and its customers and between departments as well (Dickson, It, 2010). Coming from a department perspective, conditions CMS will also ensure that every single department in the library also can stay matched and in restricted collaboration with each other. The CMS will also make certain that workflows that were used separately can now be integrated together in a single platform that can also be selectively added to as the collection adds content and new collections. A state-of-the-art CMS will also ensure that the selection has control of the taxonomies and methods used for continuously updating and managing the catalog and associated content (Rutherford, 2008). Having a cultural networking-based front-end will increase adoption rates with both patrons and library staff.
Evaluation of the Benefits and Costs of Social Networking Upgrade
The benefits of implanting social networking applications on the CMS program include the pursuing: greater adaptability of the directory and choices to the particular needs of patrons; greater coordination and integration internally between collection departments; more flexibility in tailoring the front-end program of the CMS with Facebook-like navigation to make the system even more usable online; and support for mobile devices so patrons can use their particular smartphones and tablet PCs.
The cost of this social networking upgrade include the costs from the CMS software program; the costs of customizing the front-end interface to the particular needs from the patrons; costs of incorporation and info migration to the CMS in the manual program in use today; and the dangers of insufficient adoption in case the system does not appeal for the specific needs of inner staff and patrons. In addition there are the costs of continual repair and support, and the costs of training to keep the system ready to go over the long lasting.
Bernoff, J., Li, C. (2008). Harnessing the potency of the oh-so-social web. ÜBER Sloan Managing Review, 49(3), 36-42.
Dickson, A., It, R. L. (2010). Online community in educational libraries: The possibilities and the concerns. New Catalogue World, 111(11), 468-479.
Mark-Shane Scale. (2008). Facebook being a social search engine and the effects for libraries in the twenty-first century. Library Hi Technical, 26(4), 540-556.
O’Reilly, T. (2006). Web 2. 0: Trapped on a identity or hooked on value? Doctor Dobb’s Diary, 31(7), 10-10.
Rutherford, T. L. (2008). Implementing social software in public areas libraries. Selection Hi Technology, 26(2), 184-200.