The vaticinate of the temple ought to be construed literally rather than figuratively. It is because it was provided at a time when ever Ezekiel was still being in captivity. Since Ezekiel was in captivity while proclaiming this prediction, this time was literal but not figurative. Similarly, Ezekiel’s apocalyptic prophecies tend to have close commonalities with prophecies found in the revelations, which is another recommendation that the prophecy is more exacto than figurative. In Ezekiel 40-42, Ezekiel describes a temple that is to be constructed and will be used for worshiping for not the particular Israelites nevertheless also the entire world.
Since the serenidad being explained has never been created, it becomes evident that the prediction is yet to be satisfied.
At the begining of chapters of Ezekiel 40, the telepathist talks penalized taken to Jerusalem in a eyesight. It is from this vision that he is demonstrated a new brow. The reason why the prophecy much more literal than figurative is because most prophecies are open-handed.
For example, the same way Goodness showed Ezekiel a real forehead, a similar brow was shown to David, which was later on to get built by Solomon in Jerusalem if he was full. Hence, for me, the brow that God showed Ezekiel will also be built-in Jerusalem.
The various other reason why Ezekiel’s prophecy was more textual than radical is due to the main points covered inside the chapters. Measurements of the temple walls as well as courtyards and gateways associated with vision appear more literal. Although this kind of vision is yet to become fulfilled, the bookof facts states that there will be no temple constructed in the Fresh Jerusalem since it is The almighty and the lamb that will represent the brow. Due to this revelation, it is apparent that the prediction is textual since zero temple will be constructed.
In Ezekiel 44-46, Ezekiel talks of sacrifices that is offered in the new temple. This kind of prophecy is usually literal as it is challenging to believe that sacrifices will come in to existence again in the future. For me, this prophecy is textual since instead of sacrifices, the vision depicts memorial eschew similar to those that occurred through the first coming of Christ such as the previous supper. Over the last supper, Jesus asked his disciples to work with bread and wine in his commemoration. This implied that God wants this form of commemoration as opposed to the regular sacrifice.
For me, the sacrifice visualized in the temple by Ezekiel is far more literal than symbolic since it represents arsenic intoxication Jesus as opposed to the literal pet sacrifice. Through this, it truly is evident that the temple visualized by Ezekiel will be happy by Jesus’ second approaching. In Ezekiel 45-46, this individual talks of the prince that will carry out his roles with justice and righteousness. For instance, when it comes to taxes, this royal prince will ensure that he requires only what one can find the money for, this is in relation to one’s financial ability. For this reason revelation, it might be evident that the prophecy ought to be understood as literal rather than figurative.
La Sor, William Sanford, David Allan Hubbard, Frederic William Bush, and Leslie C. Allen. Old Legs Survey: The Message, Type and Background of the Older Testament. Grand Rapids, Mich: W. N. Eerdmans, 1996.
Price, Randall. “Ezekiel’s Prediction of the Brow. Regarding the Holy bible. n. m. Available at http://www.worldofthebible.com/Bible%20Studies/Ezekiel%27s%20Prophecy%20of%20the%20Temple.pdf
“Reflections around the First Testament. 2009. Available at http://garyeyates.blogspot.com/2009/12/temple-in-new-testament html.
1Get your custom Essay