Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page

World famous homicide trial in the o m simpson

Pages: 1

I believe we do include a criminal justice program, however mistaken it may be. Our system has become unique to each individual, in the different methods each situation is handled. This countrys criminal proper rights system provides structured itself to our œcapitalistic society. Since in our society, money does talk. The fact is, one simply cannot just go away and pay fees to dedicate murder and then its over with. However , someone that has a lot of money can afford the very best attorney that money can buy and they can take all precautions necessary, that they may by to spend, to ensure they don’t go to imprisonment. An example of this is the O. L. Simpson circumstance.

The O. J. case was again exceptional to his situation. He bought one of the best lawyers money can buy. Then consequently that lawyer(Robert Shapiro) recently made a team that can rival any kind of defense team ever come up with. Money in the case was the step to keeping U. J. away of prison. Almost all of the evidence collected set O. L. at the place and time the tough occurred. This is the one thing the protection couldnt challenge and they recognized that. However when you have a team of lawyers that is the best you can get, you can be sure they will perform everything in their power not any to get necessarily, nevertheless keep you out of prison. That is exactly what they did, at the end of the case Um. J. Simpson was not identified to be innocent, but rather not guilty. Now the reality is, if this person on trial was a waste man in New York City, he probably would have jail now. If he was assigned a public defender, his chances of staying away of imprisonment drop considerably. Public defenders are always more than booked and understaffed, in order that will limit your chances automatically. But since he hired his own lawyer, this individual wouldnt have the ability to pay for a higher profile legal professional suck since Robert Shapiro.

So , obviously we do have got a lawbreaker justice system and in can offer justice sometimes. But it is most definitely flawed. As shown in the Simpson case, money does acquire you a verdict. Perhaps our rights system is suited for lesser criminal activity and cannot be applied to celebrities and players or politicians. It seems anytime someone with money go into a court space, they come out unscathed. When a lesser offense is dedicated by someone who does not have as much money, our system appears to provide justice in the appropriate manner. For any certain case to be dual jeopardy, it indicates a person would have to have got goneto trial twice and have been convicted of the same criminal take action both times. There are three examples which have been argued to get double peril, the O. J. trial, the police officials accused of beating Rodney King plus the Miranda trial. All of these situations were not twice jeopardy. A lot of people may argue that they were. However in every case, the first time the person or get together went to trial, they were not convicted. To. J. was acquitted within a criminal court however he lost in a civil case.

Therefore , he earned the first time and lost the 2nd trial. The officers inside the Rodney Ruler beating, these people were acquitted intended for undue power, but they had been convicted in federal the courtroom for violating civil privileges. Last but not least, the supreme court threw out the Miranda circumstance because a croyance was inadmissable. However , Miranda was afterwards convicted for the same charges within trial. So , it is impossible for these situations to be dual jeopardy when ever nobody was convicted inside their first trial appearance.

Prev post Next post