Government is the basis of almost all modern world. If living under oppressive governmental regulation was our only offered option, could we be better off living in daily dread and distress, or will it possibly be more good for have no govt at all? In James A. Micheners historic novel The Bridge at Andau, it might be apparent that an oppressive govt is certainly not better than having no govt at all, due to inhumane functions committed by the AVO, the overwhelming volume of Hungarians revolting against the govt, and the reality the residents ended up centralizing and working together to survive actually once they had been out of the hands of communism.
Initially of the novel, terrible acts of violence committed by AVO, or maybe the oppressive authorities in Hungary, are explained. Michener writes, “The tanks machine weapon ripped out a volley, and several fresh workers fell in the street” (Michener 9), or in other words, an AVO tank killed harmless, disarmed workers in the streets of Hungary whom could only defend themselves with pebbles and their very own hands. This kind of cruel work helps provide evidence that an oppressive government can be not a lot better than no government because naturally in this case, an oppressive authorities caused various innocent lives to be ruined. Additionally , Michener describes a great act of violence carried out by the AVO later in the novel, describing that the AVO would pry information away of captured Hungarians seeking to escape by using “beatings, nail pullings, great rifle butts onto insteps and other tortures” (Michener 109), which even more proves the idea that having simply no government much more desirable than an oppressive, violent 1 because nobody would want these question on their most severe enemy, also to think that it can be their own federal government, the individuals “protectors” doing these vicious acts is definitely unthinkable. It will be better to have zero government by any means than to have an oppressive govt and be susceptible to meaningless serves of assault such as all those committed by AVO.
Moreover, the overwhelming number of Hungarians that were eager to digital rebel against the federal government further shows that having no govt is preferred to living under a great oppressive one particular. Michener declares that “nearly two hundred 1, 000 refugees come to Austria” (Michener 232) which can be an outstanding number of individuals considering the humble population of Hungary at the time. The fact that so many people experienced that they had no additional choice than to run away their own region furthers the idea that an oppressive government is much less desirable than having simply no government. One other example of the large population of Hungarians that had been against the government is the result of Michener, who have stated, “most Hungarians abhorred communism, inch and later offered more facts, stating that “ninety-five percent of Hungarians hated all their brand of communism” (Michener 268), or put simply, even though not really everyone ended up being fleeing Hungary, a vast majority of the region loathed the federal government strongly. Mainly because almost the entire population of Hungary despised their oppressive government, it can be argued a country can be better off having no govt in comparison to a great oppressive a single, as being constantly oppressed with a government can result in a across the country revolt, like the one that occurred Hungary.
The fact the Hungarians had been still in a position to peacefully cooperate and combine amongst the other person after they acquired escaped Hungary proves that having simply no government is superior to an oppressive one, as the Hungarians would be able to function with no government. When the AVO demolished the connection at Andau, prohibiting Hungarians from escaping, three college students “repaired the dynamited bridgeand saved much more than two 1, 000 people that night time alone” (Michener 229). This kind of extraordinary work demonstrates that Hungary could exist without the AVO since they had usa together to help one another avoid. Later, after hundreds of thousands of Hungarians got fled all their country, “farm wives reported to soup kitchens at nighttime and proved helpful until dawn” (Michener 243), demonstrating the Hungarians would be able to again bring together to help another, allowing them to function even without the guidance of the government.
In The Connection at Andau, the majority of Hungarians preferred near-anarchy to getting oppressed underneath the AVO, suggesting that staying oppressed within government is usually worse than having simply no government. The cruel serves of assault committed by the AVO, a good many in Hungary that despised communism, and the unity that Hungarians proven after fleeing their region proves which the absence of govt is preferable to government oppression.
Works Mentioned:
Michener, Wayne A. The Bridge at Andau. New York: Random Home, 1957.
Rose, Gideon. Is a great Oppressive Authorities Better than Disturbance? Council about Foreign Contact. Council in Foreign Relationships, 9 September 2013. Net. 7 Oct. 2015.
