Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot is a mid 20th century play of the genre in the “Theatre of the Absurd”, and focusing on the senselessness in the human state. The idea of the absurd is a major idea in Looking forward to Godot and is also embodied in the main heroes. Estragon (Gogo) and Vladimir (Didi), used together, represent the universal man facing the world. Beckett uses every character to demonstrate the limitations and absurdity of numerous aspects of man existence.
The pair of Vladimir and Estragon exemplifies, in the metaphysical level, the dichotomy of man’s nature in body and mind, and illustrates the constraints and senselessness of these parts of human nature.
In Waiting for Godot, Vladimir and Estragon symbolize the mind/body duality in the human being, an elementary principle in Western beliefs. Beckett’s objective is to illustrate through these characters the limitations of the body and mind, taken separately or with each other, which stop us by coping with the finite being.
In Waiting for Godot Vladimir represents the mind, when Estragon represents the body. “The pair of Vladimir and Estragon represent a sort of Everyman, by simply embodying complementary aspects of human nature: Vladimir the intellectual side of guy, Estragon the corporeal” (Webb, 27). Through the entire story Beckett presented Vladimir as the intellectual who will be concerned with various philosophical and theological complications, while Estargon is more worried about bodily joys and materialistic gains. Nevertheless these two tramps seem to be not perfect individuals or an imperfect pair in contrast to the Traditional western idea of individual existence, which views guy as capable of achieve perfection through the co-operation of the two aspects of human nature.
Beckett applied different emblems to reinforce the sense in the mind/body mix and match in the Vladimir-Estragon pair. “Their names advise their individuality “Vladimir”, for instance , means “ruler of the world”, a brand that advises the hope of mind to master the universe by simply reducing that to expertise, while Estragon, the French word for the herb, tarragon, is a installing name for the character so earthbound and with these kinds of persistent physical appetites” (Webb, 27). The mind/body dichotomy, as it looks in the perform, reveals Vladimir as the intellectual who thinks mostly in terms of the past and the future, when Estargon is far more concerned with body pleasures which will link him to the present. Initially of Work I Vladimir reflects upon the theological problem of the thieves around the cross and manages to provide a valid argument. Estragon, alternatively, failing to seize the importance of the problem will not think and dismisses the matter by saying: “People are bloody unaware apes” (Beckett, 7).
Estragon’s answer is extremely ironic mainly because it condemns the behaviour of people like him. When ever Vladimir can be wrestling together with the discrepancies among the four evangelists on the subject of both the thieves, Estragon is only able to recollect the colours and illustrations of the Gospels. Gogo is known as a “lover of sight” capable to know truth as he sees it and attached to the sensible community surrounding him, while Didi is a “lover of wisdom” relating to the intellectual world or the associated with the Forms. Moral concerns do not fascination Estragon, who also seeks materialistic gains. Over the play he desires foodstuff and cash: he wants Pozzo’s bone tissues, he believes he may obtain money if he holds back for him, he desires to15325 get more bone tissues for finding Pozzo up etc . Estragon’s unconcern on the discussions and problems of the others is likewise illustrated simply by his habit to drift off in the middle of a debate.
Vladimir and Estragon’s focus on the divine (intellectual) and the earthly, respectively, may also be seen in many different characteristics that they posses. “With some persistence, Didi of Act My spouse and i speaks since mind, and Gogo because body. Therefore, Gogo feeds on, sleeps, and fears conquering while onstage, whereas Didi ponders psychic salvation. Didi is the even more eloquent in the two with Gogo sitting down, leaning, limping, falling, i actually. e. looking for nearness towards the ground” (Cohn, 171). Vladimir has difficulties with his head wear, symbolizing his relation to the sky or divine, although Estragon together with his shoes which will represent his association to the ground and earth.
Vladimir has a “stinking breath” which is also related to the top and consequently to the mind, whereas Estargon features “stinking feet” which bring up him to the ground. Estragon also consumes radishes and carrots, which are earthly fresh vegetables, symbolizing his dependence on our planet. It is obvious that Vladimir represents the intellectual, when Estragon represents the physical and corporeal. However the two characters tend not to posses these types of aspects of human being character in excellence or perfection. Instead they are imperfect and are influenced by bodily and intellectual restrictions.
Beckett uses Vladimir and Estragon to emphasize the limitations from the aspects of human nature which they stand for. “In Beckett’s trilogy of French books, which this individual subsequently translated into British, a mind is precariously fastened to bodies in succesive levels of decay, and that extremely decay may well originate in Descarte’s declaration: that body”¦ is always divisible, and that brain is totally divisible” (Cohn, 171). The intellectual section of the human being offers great defects since realistic thought, which usually we agree to unquestionably, may be subject to skepticism and can appear illogical. Through the entire play Vladimir and Estragon are unable to address simple challenges using reason. In Work I they can be not able to rationalize what day of the week it is. “But what Sat? And is this Saturday? Can it be not somewhat Sunday? Or Monday? Or perhaps Friday? ” (Beckett, 10). It seems that although the two character types try to solve philosophical or perhaps theological challenges, they hardly ever manage to find a rational summary and finally surrender.
Vladimir is unable to explain why people accept Luke’s accounts of the two thieves, and ultimately lets the matter unanswered. Estragon, on the other hand, needs to always be told about straightforward things such as who they are waiting for. “What do we carry out now? as well as I avoid know/ Discussing go/ We can’t/ Why not? / Wish waiting for Godot” (Beckett, 51). In Work II Estragon has a extremely faulty memory manifesting the constraints of the intelligence, “And Pozzo and Lucky [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksL_7WrhWOc], have you neglected them also? /Pozzo and Lucky? /He’s forgotten anything! ” (Beckett, 67). Beckett is focusing the flaws of the intellect in order to support the Sceptic idea that explanation is incapable of knowing the truth. He is accentuating the incompleteness of the individual and the purposeless or inconceivable world we live in.
The second aspect of human nature, the body, is additionally subject to restriction and damage. In keeping with their respective concentrates, Estragon is suffering from foot difficulties while Vladimir complains that his cap causes his head to ache. “Vladimir seems to have gonorrhea, mainly because it makes urination difficult and painful for him” (Webb, 30). The limitations with the corporeal are usually reflected in Estragon’s recurrent desire to eat and Vladimir’s need to urinate. Another flaw of the human body is emphasized by the characters’ inability to keep their stability. “End with the embrace. Estragon, no longer reinforced, almost falls”, “Vladimir draws up the trousers, looks at the leg allows it to go. Estragon almost falls” (Beckett, 74).
The two character types stumble or fall in many occasions through the play. Both Vladimir and Estragon go through physical soreness, which is the manifestation with the body’s restrictions. Vladimir seems pain if he laughs and urinates, while Estragon puts up with a constant ft . ache. Estragon was likewise beaten in Act II, reflecting the suffering endured by his body. All of these imperfections of the corporeal enhance the idea that body and mind are susceptible to limitation and deterioration, and manage to support the sceptic view of human nature and life.
Beckett presents his main heroes as mind and body according to “Cartesian dualism”, which sights these two aspects of human nature because different chemicals (Williams, 73). He likewise emphasized the imperfections and inadequacies with the body and mind which will prevent us from finding a purpose in life. “All fictional as well as philosophical ramifications of Beckett’s articles appear to originate from this notion of the limited condition of guy, who is not so much tragic as he is absurd, even preposterous, because, in the efforts to overcome the primary anguish of his lifestyle, he uses faulty gear, resulting in a number of paradoxes” (Williams, 75). Beckett is trying to exhibit that the restrictions of the body and head do not allow the universal person to cope with his finite living.
When he is definitely searching for realistic explanations the inadequacy of his explanation prevent him from accomplishing this. And his human body, the channel of actions, is hard to rely on and in frequent decomposition. Guy is stuck in this useless being. Apparently he must await death that will finally provide an end to his purposeless and absurd existence. Beckett expressed through this play the senselessness of human nature. He exemplified the limitations of the mind and body which keep man reliant and unable to find a meaning or purpose for his being. Vladimir and Estratgon represent the universal guy, who is incapable of explaining the philosophical and theological problems affecting his life. Like a “rational animal” man is forced to live a contemplating life, but when his mind and body fail to provide him with a legitimate explanation and meaning intended for his existence, they can only await death that will finally take him away of this ongoing and in vain cycle of contemplation.
1
