Excerpt coming from Thesis:
Support for the second hypothesis, that guy speakers would be perceived as less cooperative than female speakers, also diverse across circumstances, and the effect was actually smaller” (Edwards Hamilton 2004). Support pertaining to the Tannen model simply was identified after extra research was done, and a new set of questions was given that scored recipient’s self-perception with regards to feminine and masculine qualities and inculcation into traditional gender tasks. Individuals with solid gender self-images were more likely to fall in range with the Tannen model of ladies perceiving nurturance and males perceiving issue in fairly neutral scenarios and viewing men generally as significantly less cooperative.
This kind of study can be provocative upon several amounts, not minimal of which in its stress after the customized nature of gender norms and the lack of inherent biological tendencies towards perceiving nurturance and turmoil. It advises the need to more carefully display screen subjects when it comes to individualized interaction styles, and also when researching the idea of ‘face’ and loss thereof, to examine facets of the person’s self-concept, based in gender, nevertheless also perhaps based in traditions. Or will individuals by less individual cultures than the United Sates exhibit a less vast gender range of self-associations than any other nations? Upcoming research and greater examine of issue perceptions in terms of culture and gender is important to answer this provocative issue.
Edwards, Renee Mark a Hamilton. “You Need to Understand My Male or female Role: An Empirical
Test of Tannen’s Model of Male or female and Connection. ” Sexual Roles. 40. 7/8 (2004):
491-504. Exploration Library. ProQuest. 30 April. 2008 http://www.proquest.com/
Oetzel, David G. Stella Ting-Toomey. “Face concerns in interpersonal conflict. “
Interaction Research. 31. 6 (2003): 599-624. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest.
30 Oct. 2008. http://www.proquest.com/
Tannen, Deborah. You Just Miss: Women and Men in Conversation. New york city:
Harper Paperbacks, 2001.
Ting-Toomey, Stella. “Cross-Cultural Face-Negotiation: A great Analytical Overview. “
David See-Chai Lam Centre intended for International Communication Pacific Area
Forum in Business and Management Connection
Presented about April 15, 1992. 35 Oct 2008. http://www.cic.sfu.ca/forum/ting-too.html
Whitham, Chris. “Face – Discussion Theory. inches Communication 3 thousands. Communication Ideas.
The School of Illinois. 30 March 2008.