203-423-5246
Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page
Get your custom sample essay

Ikea’s Global Sourcing Challenge: Indian Rugs and Child Labor Essay

IKEA is a Swedish company producing home furnishing products by low prices. The corporation was founded in 1943 by Ingvar Kamprad and stored growing tremendously from a couple of stores in 1964 to 114 shops in year 1994.

It’s very helpful to mention the ikea’s eye-sight that says “Creating an improved life pertaining to the many people” for understanding the deep credo of saving cost of most the departments of IKEA, everything that IKEA does provides the aim of lowering price to the consumer. Besides its success stories, the corporation has experienced environmental and social concerns. The environmental concern of Chemical was solved but product sales dropped by 20% in Denmark.

We will write a custom essay on On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on t specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

In 1992, the business got a similar issue, which will cost IKEA around $7 million. IKEA learned a lesson; promotion can bring a huge loss in sales, not really considering the harm to the brand photo. In the springtime of 1995, another film is threaten to be proven on German television regarding children working at looms at Rangan Exports, a great Indian company used by IKEA, and the producer then invited IKEA to deliver someone to take part in a live discussion during the program.

These types of events advised the company to consider environmental and social issues more seriously. It is vital to focus to the long term deal that IKEA establishes using its suppliers, the truth is they encourage “to develop long-term business partners”, and in addition they say “… We are in this for the long run” always while using aim of minimizing cost and creating a faithful relationship. On the process of globalization, IKEA needs to get the least expensive suppliers and for that reason goes to countries that offer inexpensive labor.

When IKEA arranged its suppliers in these countries, it could not avoid these types of problems. The very fact that IKEA does not possess its own production facilities; rather it uses subcontracted manufacturers worldwide for items makes it more advanced and difficult to keep track of the company’s suppliers and subsuppliers (almost 2300 suppliers in seventy countries and a range of 11200 products). It is even more complicated to keep track of kids working in homes where complete families labored on looms from your subsuppliers’ level.

The best strategy is to steer clear of social and environmental issues right from first as when these issues emerge, they instantly affect the products’ sales immensely. To avoid this threat of loss in profit, IKEA may consider withdrawing from India. Yet , if IKEA withdraws from India marketplace, it will shed a big chance of cheap labor and put the company at drawback position since other opponents accessing a similar opportunities to remain competitive for lower product prices. IKEA for that reason should not choose a new business option by giving India nevertheless keep up with fashionable and succeed of the issue and its rivals.

Some people may possibly argue that in case the company is actively associated with the issue, it may have a drop in profit in comparison to its competitors. The menace may be true in the short term as well because of the term of termination of the deal. However , IKEA can turn the threat right into a big prospect in the long term by simply actively including and publicizing its success whit the site and display advertising in the marketplace to let buyers appreciate the work, as performed before with the forest issue.

The strict partnership using suppliers doesn’t permit IKEA to get away from one of his supplier when problems happen, the supply network will be afraid from the tendencies of the firm when an help is needed; the truth is IKEA says that “We do not purchase from our suppliers. We buy unused creation capacity” in this manner we can note that the suppliers depends via IKEA. To visit or to not go to the demonstrate?

If the demonstrate ensure IKEA the possibility of speaking freely also to defend itself, so to manage to speak and offer further description of the trouble, they should move; if the display doesn’t ensure any liberty of speaking and the show will be simply a “public pillory”, IKEA should not get and do a press meeting the day after, where it will make clear deeply the press release and the goal of IKEA for the future. For this complex condition, it is recommended that IKEA should sign up for the program. The organization had gained already several positive successes to the child labor concern since the issue was first increased by Swedish television.

IKEA could go over the information completely collected until now from UNICEF, Swedish Save the Children and the ILO and possess it had a similar attitude while the director of the documentary film and also reaching the same goals of deleting kid labor. It may show it is appreciation for the director to get helping location the child labor at the company’s manufacturer and emphasizing that the company is going to analyze the truth more deeply. IKEA possibly brings up its heart of not avoiding errors to search for creative solutions.

Moreover with a carefully considered strategy, participating in the tv screen program will help save the manufacturer and picture. After the tv set program, IKEA needs to develop a solution pertaining to the case as well as the long-term strategy to deal with kid labor concern, and acknowledging that the term of the agreement was too strict, and it would be preferable to establish a plan (3-5 years) for the future with those countries. Barner will need to make making a stop in Rangan Exports and research the case completely and speak to the reality of the facts. Every one of the children doing work there should be gathered and offered education options (Corporate Interpersonal Responsibility, Nationality of the company).

The company should create its very own children budget to help kids found functioning. By this way, IKEA could continue it is relationship using its suppliers (most of them are in developing countries), calling for the cooperation via suppliers to let IKEA’s specialist random inspection. Working with Rugmark is another great option if IKEA can make sure the child labor problem is under control.

Because IKEA does not include its own companies and gets its products from other suppliers, it is demanding for IKEA’s ability to manage and control the whole creation process. Until IKEA can be certain that there’s no kid labor inside the company, it is encouraged to allow Rugmark to monitor the use of child labor on IKEA’s behalf. In the event IKEA follows the steps discussed above, it can improve its level of cultural responsibility and sustainability. The organization could enhance itself to the even higher-level, an active level, by executing more assertive and precise ideas.

The fun level guarantees a long-term advantage in brand picture and revenue as completed before together with the “going green” program. Since child labor is considered “Indian culture”, it takes a lot of time, energy and fund to make improvement. The company has to work tightly with UNICEF, NGOs, and Save your children Alliance to understand from each other.

In India, because of economic initiatives, families send children to work. Therefore , to improve the situation, IKEA need to finance a budget inside the need of education for the people families. Besides, the company should lobby to coerce the government to become involved more actively in the process.

In the long run, family profits boosting strategies need to be integrated to obtain a better standard living for American indian families because poverty may be the root of the situation.

Prev post Next post