Excerpt via Term Paper:
Functionalism structuralism inside the works of Levi-Strauss, Eliade Malinowski
The functionalist and structuralist approaches to understanding human culture inside the works of Claude Levi-Strauss, Mircea Eliade, and Bronislaw Malinowski
The introduction of anthropology because the study and analysis of human ethnicities necessitated the formulation of theoretical frames and types in which sociable relations amongst humans and their artifacts, traditions, traditions, and beliefs are further understood. Innovations in the social sciences in the twentieth 100 years demonstrate the advancement in anthropological research, wherein diversity and awareness of other individual societies have got encouraged research and analysis on American as well as Far eastern cultures (i. e., countries from the Asian, African, and Middle Eastern regions).
It can be in this context that the hypotheses on ethnic analysis simply by Claude Levi-Strauss, Mircea Eliade, and Bronislaw Malinowski happen to be developed, changing the way anthropological methods and analysis had been conducted to get research uses. In this conventional paper, the specialist argues that Levi-Strauss and Eliade introduced the structuralist theory of analyzing social traditions and customs in human communities, while Malinowski’s research had led to the development of social anthropology, which subsists to the functionalist perspective of cultural research. A comparison analysis between Levi-Strauss and Eliade’s and Malinowski’s hypotheses is executed, wherein the finding that the two theoretical fundamentals complement the other person in repeating the fact that myths within cultures in order to create meaning in the lives of people being a community, sharing similarities with regards to history, terminology, artifacts, traditions, and morals.
Levi-Strauss’s subsists to the structuralist perspective in explaining the emergence and development of several cultures in human society. His theory posits that cultures could be best described through the myths that prevail in them, fighting that common myths are composed of pairs of units or concepts that are held together by traditions and customs of the society. Furthermore, Levi-Strauss argues why these pairs of concepts tend to be contradicting or perhaps opposites in their nature, which usually ultimately determines the composition in which that particular culture is located. In his book “Mythologies, inch he elucidates on his method of analyzing man cultures and the nature of every, stating, inch… since the study of language in general associated with the particular languages which have been around or remain in existence is an endless task, their very own common houses will never turn into encapsulated within a final set of rules. If and when universals happen to be reached, their framework will stay open in order that new determinations can be adduced while earlier ones can be enlarged or corrected. inch This passing reflects the very fact that structuralism made possible the determination of any culture’s character through
