Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page Get your custom sample essay

Discrimination and affirmative action should case

Ethnicity Discrimination, Male or female Discrimination, Yes Action, Experienced

Excerpt by Case Study:

What is happening is definitely the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission payment (EEOC) released a ruling called MARYLAND 715. Inside they changed the hiring requirements and reporting criteria for U. S. gov departments. The most notable contain: reducing credit reporting requirements, having senior managers accountable for attaining agency objectives (versus to whom they are hiring), the elimination of predetermined quotas and monitoring pertaining to trends once discharging these groups. This is certainly designed to make sure that all government agencies happen to be hiring the very best person intended for the job. Rather than someone, who also fits into a specific demographic in the population which can be considered to be a minority (based on cultural, gender or perhaps disability). This is important, because it is illustrating how you will discover two distinct standards used by the federal government when employing various individuals that fall into these kinds of categories. While those who are handicapped and have served in the military, are given choice over other minorities, females along with nondisabled experts. (“Federal Civilian Employment Endorsement Action, inches 2000) (Muhl, 1999, pg. 48)

We will write a custom essay on On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on t specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

This is in course violation with the U. S i9000. Supreme Court’s case preceding on endorsement action. The actual determined is the fact employers simply cannot justify ethnicity classifications by simply citing social discrimination. Instead, they have to present that past discrimination occurred and that they need to remedy these actions by having these personal preferences in place. Furthermore, they found that each software must be built to show that it is helping to accomplish larger company interests. (Muhl, 1999, pg. 48)

In the case of DVAAP, this is highlighting how the federal government is violating earlier Supreme Court rulings by providing hiring tastes to incapable veterans. Furthermore, they found that these techniques are giving specific benefits to someone who served inside the military which is disabled above everyone else through having predetermined quotas that are in place. And, it is demanding all firms to statement their findings to the OPM. (Muhl, 99, pg. 48)

This is troubling because, it allowing different levels of discrimination to take place inside all national agencies through the differences in these policies. Once this happens, is when these organizations will be able to make use of this to hire one particular select group of individuals above another. Down the road, this means that a large number of agencies could have higher percentages of handicapped veterans compared to everyone else. Because of this, this will more than likely result in some type of lawsuit that may be directed at the us government. This is because you will discover obvious differences between the two programs for anyone else and disabled experts. As a result, this kind of group should not be given hiring preferences above other qualified individuals. Rather, the federal government should mirror the program with others that they are utilizing when employing / promoting minorities, ladies and nondisabled experienced. (Muhl, 1999, pg. 48)


DVAAP. (2011). Feds Hire Vets. Retrieved from: http://www.fedshirevets.gov/hire/hrp/dvaap/index.aspx

National Civilian Job Affirmative Actions. (2000). NARA. Retrieved by: http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OP/html/aa/aa08.html

Muhl, C. (1999). Affirmative Action Requirements. Regular monthly

Prev post Next post