Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page

46247234

Management, Style

ESSEY THE LAST FORT This video presents the internal structure of the organization and also a parallel between two leading styles. The leadership style of two people will have outcomes on the people they lead and on a final of the issue. The whole action of the motion picture is pressurized in the components described by simply Gen.

Irwin at the outset of the movie: he admits that that a fortress must have four key elements, which include: the location, positioned on high floor, it must have protection from their enemies having a high wall structure, it must range from the garrison (men willing to fight and eliminate for the castle), not only that, a castle must have a flag, the men have to guard by any means. These symbols genuinely describe the corporation presented in the movie and forecast the taken over as well as the change with the leader.

The officially named manger from the prison is Winter who may be presented as the bad guy” who have commands it is subordinates. But the true leader of the prisoners will be Gen. Irwin, offered as the “good guy that will lead its subordinates by offering them self-respect and setting a good example. Both of them have solid characteristics of leaders yet one is completely outclassed by bad features and the other a single by moral and ethical principles. One has legal specialist but speculate if this trade the real electrical power over the criminals.

Gen Irwin is equiped as leader by the prisoners due to his reputation away from prison, his values and charisma although also his position of prisoner. Different ones saw him as one of these people that will really represent their very own interests. The way each leader will impose his electrical power is provided in an antithesis. Irwin tries to lead it is men by creating value and confident attitude nevertheless the other 1 tried to lead by serious punishments. This individual controlled all of them through dread and underhanded behavior enjoying his superior position. People trust a single and dread the other one.

Winter only wanted benefits for him, to get recognized as an effective leader between the peers and had no respect for the prisoners. He was proud of his performance as being a prison movie director where no one intended to get away and no killers took place. He totally ignored the treatment he himself used on the prisoners including eradicating them. In contradiction with Winter, Irwin cared about his men rather than nurturing about him self and how could he gain from his placement. He entrusts his guys and reactivates their self respect and the attitudes of soldiers.

If at the start from the movie the prisoners are not collaborating with each other and had been even struggling for minor reasons, following Gen. Irwin takes control, the prisoners become a group and start to trust and also to help each other. (as such as when one prisoner shows that the wall membrane isn’t build correctly he can aggressed, but Irwin assigned a small level of power to him and makes the other kinds listen to that young hostage who will regulate the wall structure construction). Regarding the characteristics that made Gen.

Irwin an effective leader I could talk about morality and ethical concepts, the value for the members of his staff, ability to plan ahead using the methods available, ability to build self-confidence in people and motivate these to achieve a prevalent goal, personal commitment to that goal (that lead to his death) and also viewing only the best in the members of his staff, in contradiction with Winter who just searched for the worst in the people and use those negative characteristics to manipulate the prisoners and achieve his own goals. Winter is definitely clearly afraid of Gen.

Irwin, recognizing this way his figure and electric power. He will handle differently the typical at first because he was a national hero sometime later it was because he is usually afraid of the power the general provides over the inmate and that reduces clearly his authority because organization. Finally when he views he are unable to win the General by his side he can loose his control and try in any respect to state his position. In a degree I would personally agree with the sort of leadership Winter months practices, taking into consideration the environment. That was still a jail with convicted solders and so extreme rules have to be adopted.

Punishments must be used to maintain the order between prisoners yet this does not mean that the leader of the penitentiary has to make the most of his situation and shape and make fun of the prisoners. (The best example would be together with the basket ball. That actions had zero educational goal, it was just a statement of power). Even though it can also be described that Gen. Irwin don’t knew the right way to comply with the commands given by the major specialist (Winter), truly think Irwin could not ignore the bad treatments applied to the inmates, the rule disregarding and also the value and trust that the other criminals had in him.

Seeing the abuse that Aguilar received pertaining to saluting him was probably the decision stage where the general agreed to control the command of his team. The wall that was demolished by the criminals is the symbolic act of recognizing their very own new innovator and of taking to fallow his order. In the end in the movie, Winter months losses control on the prisoners, on the protects and finally upon himself. Gen Irene will need his place, becoming the actual leader for the criminals but also for the guards that will prove their particular respect simply by refusing to seal him straight down.

This history is perfectly valid pertaining to the real world organization environment. Within a company, the manager isn’t that preoccupied regarding the subordinates, but awards with his shows it acquires. Also, the managers make lots of rigid rules to keep up disciplines and a sustained working schedule. At first, people might follow the rules because of fearing in order to the secret and burning off their careers. But they can still have another innovator that although does not have official power has the admiration of all the staff and might help them change the situation and gain their rights within the organization.

This motion picture points out that leadership can be described as powerful device with which you can bring together people and attain a common goal but if it is far from used properly it can provide you with or your company to self-destruction. The concept displayed by movie about the two distinct points of look at regarding leadership is definitely found in the business world on the large scale and with other types of ramifications (that that violent but surly extremely important for the well-being of the company associated with the employees ).

Prev post Next post