Mcdougal must determine the expand of screening or the number of items to review. For example the moment auditing cash receipts, a great auditor might wish to examine every single cash disbursement or simply a sample of those. The sufficiency of the evidence needed establishes the number of items to test.
Time of Screening
Another decision which the auditor need to make is when to perform each audit methods.
Year-end work ” audit procedures performed between year-end and completing audit. One example is confirming accounts receivable in December thirty-one for a client with a 12 , 31fiscal year-end.
Temporary work ” audit procedures performed before year-end. Such as confirming accounts receivable a month before year-end.
The auditor should consider the next in choosing whether and when to perform interim work in a particular account balance The interior control linked to the account
How rapidly business condition might change
Management’s predisposition to misstate the financial transactions and the potential impact of such misstatement on the accounts, and The predictability of the bank account balances at year-end.
Timing of check of settings
The auditor shall test regulates for this time, or throughout the period for which the auditor hopes to depend on those regulates in order to provide a suitable basis pertaining to the auditor’s intended dependence. When the auditor obtains evidence about the operating efficiency of control during an interim period, the auditor shall: Get hold of audit facts aboutsignificant becomes those settings subsequent to the interim period; and Decided the additional examine evidence to become obtained for the remaining period. When using taxation evidence acquired in prior audit, the auditor should consider the following The effectiveness of other portions of internal control, including the control environment, the entity’s monitoring of controls, and the entity’s risk assessment process; Raise the risk arising from the characteristics of control, including be it manual or automated; The potency of general THAT control;
The effectiveness of the control and its program by the enterprise, including the character and degree of deviations in the putting on the control noted in previous taxation, and whether there have been staff changes that significantly impact the application of control; Whether the deficiency of a change in a particular creates a risk due to changing circumstances; and The risk of material misstatement plus the extent of reliance on the control.
Substantive procedures
Irrespective of the evaluated risk of material misstatement, the auditor shall design and perform substantive procedures for every single material class of orders, account balance, and disclosure.
The auditor’s substantive audit techniques shall range from the following examine procedures associated with the financial statement shutting process: Uniting or making up the monetary statement with all the underlying data; and Evaluating material log entries and also other adjustment built during the course of setting up the financial statements. When substantive techniques are execute at an temporary date, the auditor shall cover the rest of the period simply by performing: Substantive procedure, put together with test of controls for the intervening period; and
If the auditor determines that it can be sufficient, even more substantive methods only, which provide a reasonable basis for advancing the audit conclusions through the interim day to the period end.
Choosing the audit procedures that will be applied
Following your auditor has develop particular audit goals in relation to the assertions for a particular account balance or perhaps class of transaction, the next step is to select audit procedures to attain these objectives. The selection of particular procedures to achieve a specific review objectives is influenced by following factors;
The nature and materiality with the particular component of the monetary statement (account balance or perhaps transaction). The nature of audit aim to be achieved
The reliance that may be placed on internal control structure. The relative risk of material errors or perhaps irregularities.
The types and proficiency of available evidence.
The expected performance and efficiency of feasible audit methods.
1
