Over the semester, the class offers read a great variety of bits of literature. With each studying, came a flurry of thoughts and discussions. These types of questions will be what support us for being better philosophers.
Someone who is usually on a search for become a very good philosopher should always think seriously about every arguments and follow a logical conclusion to wherever it may well lead. With Oedipus and “Forgiven”, I was able to burrow deep in the meanings from the readings and come up with philosophical ideas for equally. Another top quality a philosopher must possess is the ability to compare and contrast several works of art. Employing more course readings such as Socrates’ Apology, I found similarities and differences that described my thoughts.
In Oedipus the California king, Oedipus eliminates his father and marries his mother. He as well must identify who the murderer of King Laius is. Finally, his decisions in the enjoy cause him to find out that it was him who also killed Laius. Oedipus plainly believed that was having been doing during the time, was very good. Although ultimately, he probably regrets his decisions.
Coming from his point of view, Oedipus would most likely think that his maneuver from Corinth to Thebes was a negative decision. When he heard good news that he was going to kill his father and get married to his mother, Oedipus transferred far away from his home, Corinth. This can be something that this individual probably misgivings because staying in Corinth would have prevented him by meeting King Laius inside the road and killing him. Another negative decision coming from Oedipus’ viewpoint would be that he didn’t listen to any individual close to him.
Oedipus displays three tragic flaws, intolerance, stubbornness, and a short mood, each of which lead in to his drop. For instance, Oedipus’ stubbornness’ is usually unmistakably shown when he requirements on seeking the murderer of Laius and proving which the prophecy hasn’t come true. Nevertheless , Jocasta, Oedipus’ queen and mother already is aware of the very fact that all of this chaos holds true and decides to hide the facts. “That gentleman, why inquire? Old shepherds, talk, vacant non-sense, don’t give it another thought; don’t even think” Oedipus replies with, “What- give up today, with a idea like this? Fail to solve the mystery of my delivery?
Not for all of the world! “(Oedipus). Oedipus built these decisions because he thought he was keeping his parents by shifting away. This individual obviously did not want to marry his mother and kill his father, and so he discovered by departing Corinth he’d avoid the prediction becoming authentic.
Oedipus is an extremely stubborn guy and he won’t prevent until he gets the answers. In this case, this individual wants to discover who murdered Laius. The reasoning behind Oedipus’ poor decision to never listen to any individual was generally due to his stubbornness. I believe that in the event he had not been and so dead dress finding out whom killed Laius; asking questions and trying to figure it all away, he would not need realized it had been himself who was the murdered. Oedipus undoubtedly was not the only character all of us read about that made several un-smart decisions.
In the article “Forgiven”, the Grosmaires’ girl Ann is usually killed simply by her sweetheart Conor. They will end up deciding on to forgive Conor, even though he got their daughter’s life. Through the Grosmaires’ viewpoint, a bad decision would have gone to not forgive Conor because then, their particular daughter might have been yet another victim within a murder circumstance. Also, in their point of view, certainly not considering what Ann may have wanted in the event that she got still recently been alive would’ve been a negative decision.
If they had not stored their child in mind when choosing to forgive Conor, the Grosmaires would definitely have been dissatisfied. Ann’s mother, Kate announced, “I knew that if I defined Conor by that one moment-as a murderer-I was defining my girl as a tough victim and i also couldn’t enable that to happen” (2 Tullis). The Grosmaires’ presumed that in the event that they did certainly not forgive Conor, then all of the attention may have been on him rather than Ann. Another major factor that came into play whenever they decided to reduce Conor was their religious background. That they tried very difficult to base all their lives on the lives of Jesus and St . Augustine.
In fact , the father said, “I realized it was not just Ann asking myself to forgive Conor, it was Jesus Christ” (2 Tullis). To the Grosmaires, Conor was a part of the family members because he had been dating their particular daughter for a long time. He possibly stayed inside their home for some time.
They realized that Ann would have needed them to forgive Conor because she cherished him. By respecting their very own daughter and what she would have desired, the Grosmaires felt as if they were carrying out the right point. There are a few other choices that they could have chosen instead of forgiving Conor. For instance, they will shouldn’t include changed the minds of men about Conor’s jail time. They were doing not stay with their term and this seemed like they practically forgot about the whole idea of forgiveness.
Following hearing Conor describe just how he murdered their daughter, they allow their thoughts take a fee and they changed their minds. Certainly not forgiving Conor at all might have been another option choice intended for the Grosmaires. If this were the truth, Conor might have gotten the right justice that other criminals get. In the event that they did not really forgive Conor, there is the probability he would possess either gotten the death penalty or lifetime in prison. Either way, it’s an severe consequence than what he ends up receiving.
Conor would be forced to go through in prison for the rest of his life, finding out how much discomfort he caused the Grosmaires family. Generally, this is the advantages of most murder trials in the United States. It is very from the norm for any murderer to become forgiven in today’s world.
In the state of Sarasota where the death penalty remains to be used, it is especially unusual for the act of killing to be forgiven. In the event you dig profound into Socrates’ The Apology and “Forgiven”, the two may be easily seen as similar. First, the Grosmaires’ made a decision to reduce Conor in order to satisfy these people.
Despite the slack they received for forgiving a plainly guilty man, they nonetheless chose to continue to be close with Conor and maintain him inside their lives. The family was extremely faith based and they sensed as if it was unjust never to forgive him. Like the Grosmaires, Socrates did not allow other people to have an effect on his decision-making. He constantly chose the course less accepted as was observed in The Apology.
While he can being attempted by the city of Athens, Socrates confidently welcomes the fact that a lot of of the city’s citizens happen to be against him and goes on teaching his ideas to other folks because it was simply the right thing to do. In an occasion where Socrates stands up intended for himself, he says, ” I realized, to my sadness and burglar alarm that I was getting unpopular, but I believed that I need to attach the greatest importance to god’s oracle…” (loc 616 Apology). He truly believes in doing what morally feels acceptable, not what is socially acceptable and that is a great attribute about him.
Socrates lived his life together with the philosophy of “How can you live a fantastic life in case you don’t genuinely understand what it is? ” The Grosmaires’ adopted this viewpoint also mainly because they did certainly not fully know very well what the outcome with their decision would definitely be, but all they knew is that it produced them experience at serenity and that is what mattered. Likewise, in The Apology, Socrates says that “he who is able to recognize his limitations is wisest. ” It is extremely difficult for one solitary person to contain every knowledge of the earth. Socrates knew what he did not know which is called Socratic ignorance. This individual claimed as the wisest person because he welcome the fact that he did not know anything in the world.
In connecting Socrates to the Grosmaires, they were in a position to recognize that points could not end up being simply managed by mailing Conor to prison for a lifetime. Sure, it would get him out of their sight, yet never out of their heads. They may admit to their weaknesses and power through them with Conor and his friends and family. If the Grosmaires ended up not really forgiving him, then they might have actually been ignorant regarding the entire condition because they will knew Conor and they knew that this individual truly did not mean to hurt their very own family.
He was a good youngster who had a mental malfunction that led to a murder. It was difficult for the Grosmaires to quit thinking of Conor as a kid and to prevent loving him. In addition , Socrates makes it well-known in The Apology that he’s not scared of death. Loss of life was talked about a lot in this reading because it was the consequence Socrates was going to face if perhaps he was identified guilty.
He admits that, ” To show concern death, gentlemen, is no other than to think one self wise when ever one is not really, to think a single knows what one will not know. No person knows whether death might be the greatest of all blessings for a man, however men fear it as if they understood that it is the very best of evils” (loc 748 Apology). It was one of the best quotes from your Apology simply because it is so the case.
The Grosmaires clearly did not fear death either. To get if these were afraid, they will not have accepted Ann’s loss of life the way they performed. Instead, they tried to turn Ann’s tale into anything heroic rather than tragic.
By no means once do they allow the death with their daughter to overcome all of them. Ann was a great person in their hearts and they believed that the girl was in an improved place. There is absolutely no way the Grossmaires happen to be ever going to achieve lifespan they had before their daughter passed away because it’s extremely hard to bring her back. But , by flexible Conor they may be trying to produce peace with the idea of their Ann being removed.
They are trying to make almost everything as typical as possible again, keeping Conor and his family members in their lives. This is supporting them to attain the good your life because they were happiest using their daughter and in addition they don’t wish to lose the two their girl and Conor at the same time. Having been practically another son.
Since the Grossmaires can also be very religious people, I do think they made a decision to forgive Conor so they will could still consider themselves very good Christians. To them, these aspects contribute to the “good life”. These are comparable qualities which i consider as the good existence. In the beginning from the semester, My spouse and i said that the great life is because stress free as possible. I want to steer clear of conflict just as much as I can because conflict with family members and friends could only deliver stress in my life.
I do believe the Grossmaires family planned to bring peace into their minds and their lives, and forgiving Conor was your first step in achieving that goal. Merely am capable of look as well as be proud of my selections, that is the “good life”. The Grossmaires likely had similar mentality when they were understanding how to deal with the Conor situation. They concluded that simply by forgiving him, they would manage to continue on utilized to and try to make the most of it.
Studying “Forgiven” would not seem to modify my views on what the great life was. I think via now until forever, my personal views on that topic will remain the same. Three readings that were discussed, Oedipus, The Apology, and “Forgiven” required very much philosophical thinking on my portion.
With comparing and contrasting, I was capable of dig profound into the symbolism of each studying and think of ideas for both.