Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page

Perspectives on Human Nature Essay

Within the past five weeks we have researched three several but influential people within our perspective about human nature school.

They are Freud, Plato and Tzu. The main discussion between all of them can be nature versus nurture. I will discuss the between characteristics and foster and then I’ll apply to each of these philosophers and exactly how they respond to it. When looked up inside the dictionary the term nature means the whole world and its phenomena or one’s own persona and character. When reviewed with these kinds of philosophers it is meant because one’s individual character revolved around the galaxy for which they will live in, essentially they’re environment.

At the same time once i looked up the phrase nurture that said the upbringing, attention or training of a kid. And in this it stands on its own. Meaning exactly how it’s listed in the dictionary. Freud’s point of view on this topic is usually that the human creation depends on foster and mother nature at the same time.

Freud believes that human nature is made up of powerful unrestrainable innate hard drives and overpowered, oppressed memories. The only method that these can happen is by foster, because of a number of the innate hard disks have been raised through one’s upbringing. In a way Freud’s level of views are definitely supported by both character and nurture. Another reason in this is because if you look at just Freud’s Psychoanalytic Perspective they too support both. As an example look at the identity, the identification is all as a result of nature, the reason is because craving for food, thirst, love-making and out and out aggression is in mother nature.

But if anyone looks at superego, you find out it is supported by nurture for the straightforward fact that the superego is brought through the upbringing by training from the child. One more example of Freud’s use of characteristics and nurture together was stated by simply Freud on-page 15 of his publication and that says, ” Originally the ego comes with everything, later it separates off an external world by itself. The present spirit feeling is definitely, therefore , only a shrunken residue of any much more comprehensive indeed, a great all-embracing-feeling which will correspondence to a mere romantic bond among ego as well as the world”(15).

For me I also think that Freud’s analyses the two support character and nurture. A perfect example is the quote I kept in the last paragraph. Therefore , a whole lot of Freud’s points support nature and nurture.

Ideal examples of this are his Psychoanalytic Viewpoints. Examples of that topic are the topological version which will represent nature for the easy fact that the three main items described regarding it are all points that we have got in our brains for a long time and therefore are in the depths of the mind mind. Certainly not because we were taught those ideas but for the simple fact that they are instincts embedded in our minds pertaining to survival.

Intended for nurture the psychosexual creation is due majorly because of foster. From dental to anal-retentive these are most due to expressive characteristics which can be given or raised from birth. The one which has the the majority of effect may be the structural unit.

Reasons for myself stating this is due to the identification is the old fashioned part of the brain that is basically a natural instinct. At the same time the ego is also because of natural instinct simply because of the reality basic principle. Freud even went so far as stating, “.. adults ego-feeling can’t have been completely the same coming from beginning. It should have gone by using a process of development”(13).

The part where it improvements is the superego, which is the sole form of foster in the psychoanalytic perspective, which can be because the superego only created because the child began to integrate parental values and also runs according to the bringing up and self-discipline of the father and mother. Now if you look at Plato’s standpoint Plato facilitates nurture a lot more than nature. The only points that Plato made that would apparently support characteristics is the point he made one example is is if he talks about woman guards.

The explanation for this is also because he feels that ladies should be offered lighter work. Because of mother nature it has been seen which the women could do the weakened work in comparison to man. At the same time it could also be seen as foster for the simple fact that the cultures are raised in many ways such that girls are seen while not being able to take care of the workload of man.

My factors behind choosing nurture is because Plato through out his book makes many distinguishes which in these cases requires very well structured societies that could only be accomplished through foster and not mother nature. The reason for nurture is because every single position held in these societies are well thought up which in turn would require training from the upbringing to adulthood for these societies to run effectively. I have to declare though I found Plato a tad bit more difficult to speak about for the easy fact that Plato spent additional time discussing about society.

Thus when studying Plato, We came to the conclusion that Plato facilitates nurture a lot more than nature. My reason for this can be societies through history must be developed so when they are for the reason that of strong influence from a group of people. Instead of nature in which people could just live amongst one another without order or expert that comes with a range process.

The ultimate person I’ll talk about is usually Chuang Tzu. In reality Chuang Tzu mentioned what he supported right from the start of the publication and that is the straightforward fact that he supports mother nature over foster. Chuang Tzu even proceeded to go as far as making the declaration that, “Nurture keeps you out of touch along with your true self”(Healey). Chuang Tzu spoke significantly about other stuff, which had a deep sent meaning, in all that this individual talked about selection one variation and that is the simple fact that this individual supported characteristics over foster.

As Chuang Tzu said, “Those who have go calmly with the flow of mother nature are not bothered by both joy or sorrow. Persons like these were considered inside the part because having achieved freedom coming from bondage. These kinds of who are unable to free are constrained by things”(53).

Chuang Tzu built many feedback like this in the end, “? if you are prepared to acknowledge this and flow with it, then sorrow and joy simply cannot touch you”(24) ” The great thing to do is leave it all to fate, even if this may not be easy to do”(32). In browsing Chuang Tzu I had believed that the things he explained did not will need any answers. At the same time his view on existence have profound meanings in my opinion. His take on nature was incredible and reasonable yet at the same time I feel that through the right influential foster mankind can develop the right psychic and emotional mind to comprehend why mother nature alone should work.

In simple connotations I see foster as way to lead to the utopia that Mother. Nature provides. My reasons are that without proper understanding that can be taught by nurture, mankind wouldn’t discover how to handle the liberty from character. In conclusion browsing these literature from Plato, Freud and Tzu upon nature vs . nurture was very intriguing though it does leave one especially me considering what your life would be as though we lived on nature.

But at the same time the reasons for wondering reasonably or realizing the reality showing how it would be carried out is all due to nurture. Through nurture I’ve had time to rationalize and mature as you person.

Prev post Next post