Research from Term Paper:
Outcasts of Poker Flat” by Bret Harte, and “To Brooklyn Bridge” simply by Hart Crane. Specifically, this discusses what reasons both the main characters have for conforming (or not conforming) to the norm in these two works.
The characters in these works represent America – both the best and the most severe. They also stand for how world expects much from its individuals, and how a lot of people, no matter how hard they make an effort, simply cannot comply with the norm and fit in into a society that could only agree to them in its’ individual quite strenuous terms.
Contouring to the “norm” is one way people manage to get along in society. Society undoubtedly does “” lot coming from most people – ethically and politically, and those who will not openly adapt to society’s guidelines are often players out or perhaps seen as outsiders. In these two works, the primary characters need to conform to society’s rules to survive. In “Brooklyn Bridge, ” the main persona is really the bridge alone, and Motorised hoist portrays that in a magical or God-like way, like it is an photo to be idolized, just like the Figurine of Freedom nearby in New York Harbor. More than contouring, the connection becomes a sign of America at its ideal. It is symbolic of a contemporary society on the move, inventing new technology and rushing toward the future. Blessure writes, “Out of several subway scuttle, cell or perhaps loft / A bedlamite speeds to thy parapets, / Tilting there momently, shrill shirt ballooning, as well as A jest falls in the speechless caravan” (Crane). You can see mankind as it rushes through the congested streets of New York, then simply pausing for any moment for the miraculous connect, and then scurrying on to all their destinations. The bridge typifies solidity and permanence, a thing the flowing masses experience very rarely. The bridge conforms as to what society thinks its’ typical monuments should be – solid, long lasting, and ordering. It also signifies these attributes that make a person successful in culture, and so, this can be a lasting symbol of what works and what does certainly not. People turn to it as an icon, and as synonymous with the best the American persons can complete. Not to “worship” the Brooklyn Bridge while an American mark and something representative of American tradition and genius is to not in favor of the norm of society and culture.
In “Poker Flats, ” a similar theory of culture and society does apply. Even in the wide open and unlawful American West in the 1850s there were certain persuits and guidelines that one are required to follow in order to fit in. If the connection symbolizes the American ideal, then Mister. Oakhurst in “Poker Flats” symbolizes a large different American icon – the bad man with a cardiovascular system of platinum and a weak figure. Mr. Oakhurst cannot dedicate himself to conforming to the norm; he can only can be found in the fringes of culture. When he truly joins a successful society, this individual cannot previous there intended for long. He cannot confront the facts of your life and loss of life, and so he chooses fatality over conforming or living through. In the very small society the survivors generate in the hut on the trail, Mr. Oakhurst suddenly takes on the responsibility of leadership. Here, there is no observador group bent on ridding the town of deviants, there is certainly only a tiny, singular society that welcomes Mr. Oakhurst for what he’s. Somewhat such as the iconic determine of the Brooklyn Bridge, he becomes larger than life as well as the savior of the
