Synopsis
After eluding financial experts and investors for a long time, Parmalat went insolvent later in December, the year 2003 and many of their board of directors had been arrested since that time. Here is a brief summary in the events: Back in the 1980’s, Parmalat’s financial situation was poor because of investment in side businesses. i. at the. TV network, Parmatur, sports teams (Palmeiras, Parma, etc). Cash siphoning through these businesses was approximated to be total of ¬ 10 Bn. In 1990, Parmalat travelled public which usually enabled them to tap into the administrative centre markets.
Early 1990’s, the company began to get dairy producers around the world in order to try to conceal the developing debt.
Parmalat entered into a number of bond issuances and securitization of receivables to generate cash. A series of other fraudulent accounting practices occurred during the subsequent years. In December the year 2003, Parmalat has not been able to help to make a U$ 150MM relationship payment and raised the attention of the complete market. If the fraud was brought up, Calisto Tanzi (Parmalat founder) and Fausto Tonna (CFO) was arrested along with another 10 persons.
Grant Thornton and Deloitte & Touche had been Parmalat’s accounting firms over the last 2 years. Partners of both companies were billed for fraudulent activity.
Circumstance analysis From your analysis all of us made, there are numerous items that can be appointed since accounting basic principle violation: A) Overstatement of Assets Property Selling: Parmalat sold organizations to non-public entities and individuals to re-buy it afterwards in a imitation operation, as the money originate from other offshore entities only to create fluid in the books; thanks to that, they can keep issuing provides to cover all their debts Accountable Receivables recognition: Double invoicing the German supermarkets and other retail consumers Fake checking accounts: false doc have been designed to prove the existence of ¬ several, 9 Bn cash at Bank of America. Once again, with more fluid, more easily acquired the financial loans
B) Overstatement of earnings Revenue Identification: False income sales through its overseas companies
C) Understatement of financial obligations Debt reducing: Parmalat reduced approximately Euro 3. 3 Bn of debt. Misclassification of liabilities: describing sales of receivables as nonrecourse, when the firm maintained requirement to ensure repayment.
Proper accounting practices which will have been employed A) Resources The company recognizes earnings when the purchase meets both these styles the following conditions: 1 . Completion of the earnings method: the seller has done all (or nearly all) that is assured to do for the customer. That is, the seller provides delivered all (or almost all) from the goods and services it includes agreed to present 2 . Receipt of property from the consumer: The seller has brought cash or any other asset that it can easily convert to money, for example , simply by collecting a merchant account receivable Dependable receivables acknowledgement (billing twice)
In this case, Parmalat generated double accounts receivable for the same procedure billing equally, their marketers and the last customer. The revenue in the final customers was recognized on the catalogs, but the invoicing for the distributors had been considered as transfer and accounted for credit owed. Revenue recognition What happened here is that the vendor never completed what was written in the books, as the operation never existed and buyer never received the goods.
B) Liabilities
Debt Eliminating Parmalat eliminated paid out down debt by a group of capital industry transactions, primarily bond issuances and sale of receivables. These kinds of financing transactions were made possible by overstating their assets. Misclassification of debts Parmalat misclassified the auto financing transaction of selling their particular receivables. Although, Parmalat offered its receivables (assets) to financial institutions/investors, they were not only a true nonrecourse sale and Parmalat managed obligation to ensure the receivables were ultimately paid, consequently Parmalat should have classified this kind of financing being a liability.
1
