The clearly notable big difference between Bandura’s social intellectual theory and Beck’s intellectual theory may be the bias that every has towards behavior. For instance, Bandura’s style is more behavioral, whereas Beck’s model is inclined to psychotherapy or perhaps seems to give psychological solutions to problems. The social intellectual theory (by Bandura) is usually presented in an agentic point of view. It explains why persons exhibit differences in self-organization, being proactive, involvement in self-reflection, and in self-regulation (Bandura, 1986). In essence, the theory does not only show that human beings will vary capabilities, additionally, it shows that other factors such as the environment play a major role in shaping behaviorism (Bandura, 1986).
The theory further describes humans as makers as well as products of the actual make (the proverb good manners maketh person should be true). Bandura’s theory also shows the socio intellectual aspects of people, for example , so why they take action in particular good manners and what elicits this kind of behavior. Additionally , the theory as well gives reasons why the human characteristics is great in terms of capacities and how humanity is fashioned by immediate and observational experience that may be integrated in a variety of forms. In contradistinction, Beck’s theory provides picture of the phenomena root dysfunctional values (Beck, 1976).
This theory does not just describe personality, but provides solutions to internal problems. This is certainly achieved by the model’s blow-by-blow analysis from the casual brokers of despression symptoms and how depressive disorder can be cured (Beck, 1976). Beck’s theory seems to give mediation procedure in resolving psychological challenges by stimulating patients to become participants from the problem solving process rather than passive and helpless respondents. One more difference between the two hypotheses is the triad used in each of the theories, which usually forms the foundation of the entire illustrations and discussions. Bandura’s model is known as a triad with behavior, environmental factors and personal determinants because the main elements.
On the other hand, Beck’s cognitive version consists of behavior, antecedent events and consequences (Beck, 1976; Beck, 1998). The triads may seem to portray a similarity between your two designs but in real sense that they exhibit variations since the justification of how the elements inside the triads affect each other or perhaps act on their own is slightly different. For instance, in Bandura’s theory, the explanation of how the factors inside the triad affect each other involves cause and effect. One of the factors, including the environment is definitely implied to become cause (or a factor that determines) of behavior. As a result, there is emphasis on reciprocal determinism.
On the other hand, Beck’s triadic example of the factors that condition personality and character is usually influenced by person (self), the world and the future. In this context, it is evident that personality is usually affected not simply by patterns but likewise by different events that occur in life. In fact , Beck (1976) describes the person (self) as the main source of tips to solve major depression problems with reference to the world and anticipation of a better foreseeable future. Conclusion Bandura’s Cognitive Theory and Beck’s Cognitive Theory seem to have more similarities for the reason that they identify personality plus the factors form it. Many elements described in each theory’s triad show concurrence in meaning.
Major dissimilarities between the two models sit in the explanation of the versions. While Bandura’s model is definitely inclined toward behaviorism, Beck’s model offers an explanation of psychological sex-related and conceivable remedies. Referrals Bandura A. (2006).
Internal modeling: Conflicting theories. Chi town: Aldine Transaction. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The workout of control. New York: Watts. H. Freeman Company Bandura, A. (1986).
Social fundamentals of thoughts and actions: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Specialist Technical. Bandura, A. (1976) Social learning theory.
New York: Prentice Hall Bandura, A. (1971). Mental modeling: Conflicting theories. Chi town: Aldine- Atherton. Beck, A. (1979). Intellectual therapy of depression. Ny: Guilford Press Beck, A. (1976). Cognitive therapy & emotional disorders. NY: Worldwide Universities Press. Beck, A. (1998).
The Integrative Power of Cognitive Remedy. New York: Guilford Press.