Excerpt by Essay:
“An older, more experienced educator questions whether 15- to 17-year-old youngsters are really prepared yet to handle Keating’s label of freedom. ‘Gee, I hardly ever pegged you for a cynic, ‘ says Keating. ‘I’m not, ‘ says the various other teacher. ‘I’m a realist. ‘ Though there’s a thoroughly placed landscape in which Keating tries to associated with distinction among unfettered self-expression and self-destructive behavior, the guidelines behind the re-formation in the Dead Poets Society ultimately lead to disaster. It becomes crystal clear that by least some of the boys really aren’t emotionally equipped to add into their own lives the type of freedom and non-conformism that Keating is usually selling” (Emerson 2010). The extremity of Neil’s response shows the vulnerability of his unformed adolescent thoughts and his lack of ability to deal with his resistance to his father in a rational fashion.
However , for every his errors, by the end in the film, Keating’s students include clearly recently been transformed. Despite their concerns over what the government might carry out, when the kids stand on their desks and salute him as the ‘Captain, ‘ they display that even though may be prepare school students, they will resolve to make their particular lives incredible, and not stop to issue society. The headmaster has won the battle, but is not the battle for these boy’s hearts and minds.
However , as moving as Keating’s leadership style may be, his stance is usually not with out profound ethical concerns: is it right for a college to inspire students to defy their parents? Keating would respond that he does not wish his learners to adopt a particular ideology; rather he’s training these to be essential thinkers. The ‘realistic’ teacher who chastises him will say that it can be cruel and unrealistic to encourage young boys to view poems as a supply of inspiration and after that send them back to their particular humdrum lives, leaving these people forever disappointed. At best, this sense of rebellion lasts a few years, and still have no actual effects – Keating can threaten his job position, but not really change the world. What is really likely to happen to the boys after they stand on their tables – would such individuals, in real world, carry this kind of spirit with them for years to come, as Weir implies?
Nevertheless , the values of an severe style of command in a institution environment is much more troubling than the rebellion encouraged by Keating. A college is a community, and even if students are certainly not equal in authority with their teachers and administrators, to refuse to take care of student landscapes with esteem and to palm down harsh punishments disproportionate to the students’ ‘crimes’ will inevitably create extreme reactions in the many complacent of adolescents.
Keating’s use of transformational leadership strategies continues to demonstrate inspirational to all teachers whom do not merely want to teach, but also want to excite their particular students. Providing transformational command in the classroom stimulates dialogue and debate, it appears as though a valid style, rather than a ‘cult of individuality. ‘ Within other organizations, a self-sacrificing leader can be highly motivational, and while there is always a hazard that the head may be more appealing than his cause, regarding Dead Poet’s Society, Keating’s sacrifice seems worthwhile, whether or not only a small percentage of the students keep in the spirit of their “Captain” after they graduate student.
Dead Poet’s Contemporary society. (1989). Described by Philip Weir.
Emerson, Jim. (2010). Dead Poets Society. Gathered February 13, 2010 by Screening place. http://cinepad.com/reviews/deadpoets.htm
Straker, David. (2010). Charismatic management. Changing Brains. Retrieved Feb . 13, 2010 at http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/charismatic_leadership.htm