Do you need help writing an essay? For Only $7.90/page

Dr karl brandt karl brandt dissertation

Trial Brief, Self applied, Malaria, Euthanasia

Excerpt coming from Essay:

Apparently Brandt handled the medical demands of Bruckner well mainly because Hitler made him “his personal physician” and in period Brandt was handed the rank of “major-general in the Waffen-SS” (Spartacus Educational).

Brandt helped establish the “Law pertaining to the Security of Hereditary Health, inch which was a smokescreen pertaining to “compulsory sterilization” – and in fact Brandt was in impose of the program (“Reich Committee for the Scientific Registration of Serious Genetic and Congenially-Based Diseases”) that basically began to eliminate those who were “insane” as well as the “physically handicapped” (Spartacus Educational). The JVL explains that Brandt’s euthanasia program started out in 1939, and deformed children together with the very older and crazy were murdered by gas or deadly injections in “nursing homes, hospitals and asylums” (JVL, 1).

Through the Nuremberg Trial offers the prosecutors were “caught off shield by the quite a few affidavits submitted by the defense” that spoken to the quality of Brandt’s “personal character” (Spiro, 382). If the defense thought there were be a great response to those affidavits – notwithstanding the “wholesale murder and inappropriate torture of hundreds of thousands of innocent man beings” – they were disappointed. Indeed, the primary counsel intended for the criminal prosecution, Brigadier General Telford Taylor swift announced that the Nazi doctors had “willfully and without remorse” committed many murders, dedicated brutalities, cruelties, tortures, atrocities and other heinous acts (Spiro, 381).

Eighty-five witnesses testified at the Trials, backing up the prosecution’s dire; in addition there are 1, 471 pieces of “documentary evidence” and a total of 11, 538 pages of testimony. The behaviour of Brandt and the various other Nazi doctors on trial was, in respect to Standard Taylor, “the inevitable le outcome of the sinister undercurrent of German philosophy that preaches the supreme importance of the state as well as the complete corrélation of the individual” (Spiro, 381). Brandt’s lawyer “repeatedly” asserted that the life of anybody “was expendable if it helped ensure the continued existence with the community, inches Spiro continuing. Everything done by Brandt was done “in the pursuits of humanity” so the specific really acquired little or no meaning, ” Brandt’s attorney insisted (Spiro, 381).

Writing inside the peer-reviewed log Nationalities Paperwork, Michael Bryant points out that over time, the “restrictive use of euthanasia” for many patients ended and underneath Brandt’s command the Nazis began eradicating “healthier patients” (Bryant, 2009, 861). In reality the euthanasia program was extended to feature: “Jewish patients”; those in concentration camps who became ill; and a group of what the Nazis referred to as “asocials” (juvenile delinquents, tramps, prostitutes and panhandlers) (Bryant, 861). Bryant writes that Brandt’s declaration that having been “motivated by high ideals” did not matter to the Tribunal; he was sentenced to fatality on August 19, 1947 (870).

Curiously, while waiting to be hanged (he was executed in June one particular, 1948) Brandt was locked up at the Landsberg fortress, exactly where Hitler was incarcerated the moment Hitler published Mein Kampf (Spiro, 383). Brandt offered his “living body pertaining to medical experiments, ” however the American regulators (heading the Trials) rejected his obtain (Spiro, 383).

Works Offered

Bryant, Michael. (2009). “Only the Countrywide Socialist”: Postwar U. H. And Western world German

Ways to Nazi “Euthanasia” Crimes, 1946-1953. Nationalities Documents, 37(6), 861-888.

Glaser, Edmund. (2008/09). Ulf Schmidt’s Karl Brandt – the Nazi Doctor: Treatments and Electric power in the Third Reich and Justice by Nuremberg: Alexander and the Nazi Doctors’ Trial.

Journal of Hate Research, 7(1), 109-116.

Harvard Law School Selection. (2005). Nuremberg Trials Project / an electronic Document

Collection / Summary of NMT Case 1 U. S. A. v. Karl Brandt ain al. Gathered July twenty two

2012, by http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu.

Judaism Virtual Catalogue (JVL). (2009). Karl Brandt (1904-1948). Recovered July twenty-three, 2012, via http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org.

Spartacus Educational (2007). Karl

Prev post Next post