The intellectual approach presumes that OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER is a result of flawed and reasonless ways of pondering taken to an extreme. Patients with OCD will vary thinking patterns and more distressing thoughts. The cognitive justification stresses that everyone has undesired thoughts from time to time, but OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER sufferers cannot ignore these thoughts and they are often misunderstood, leading to self-blame and the obsessive symptoms of OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER. So that the mental poison and issues associated with a certain anxiety will not come to, compulsions arise in an attempt to ‘neutralise’ the anxiousness.
The victim becomes even more wary of having intrusive thoughts and their fear of them increases. As these ideas are constantly thought about, they become compulsive and a pattern of ritualistic, repeating behaviour starts.
A durability of this theory is that there may be supporting proof. For example , Wegner found that the group of pupils asked not to think of a white keep were more likely to do so when compared to a group allowed to think about it.
Salkoius located that when asking participants to suppress thoughts and on additional days not to, the individuals kept a diary of more invasive thoughts when they had to be under control these findings support the idea that a strategic attempt to control thoughts contributes to an increase in these kinds of thoughts; supporting the main concepts of the approach.
This is a strength for the reason that two studies have located similar conclusions and are consequently externally dependable. This makes the cognitive strategy reliable in general because it could be checked and verified plus the theory offers sound fundamentals for further analysis.
However , a weakness of the theory is the fact there are problems with the evidence. For example , Salkoius used self-report methodologies in order to measure the thoughts of the participants. Which means that the benefits may have been exposed to social desirability bias. For instance , the amount of distressing thoughts may not have all recently been recorded inside the diaries in order to please the experimenter; they might not want them to know how awful their symptoms are because of feelings of embarrassment. This really is an issue as it means the analysis lacks inner validity; the intrusive thoughts in the diary are not induced solely simply by supressing them, but you will discover other extraneous variables such as embarrassment. All of us therefore cannot prove cause and result to show that suppressing thoughts lead to symptoms in OCD, so you will discover other factors the cognitive procedure needs to look into order to offer a causal justification.
However , however are issues with self-report strategies, they can supply a greater insight into the participant’s thoughts and a greater degree of detail. They are allowing the participants to explain their own experience rather than inferring this coming from observing participants. It therefore supplies access to if you are a00 of quantitative data.
1
