Excerpt from Term Paper:
The Paleolithic artistry and lifestyle assumes the significance via more research conducted on the issue. Shea, John (441-450) argued that recently discovered stone artifacts of Midsection Paleolithic occupations of Kebara Cave (Mount Carmel, Israel) depict which the Middle Paleolithic populations used technology-assisted hunting as the artifacts had clear representation and symbolism regarding the utilization of tools which use of tools was not restricted to hominids. This kind of suggests that the paintings, artifacts, and the ethnic significance of carvings is far more than generally thought by some experts. The way of life that was prevalent in this era obviously impacted the artifacts. Further the cognitive development of man is also represented in the artifacts as these were drawn, designed, and developed by using same tools and technology materials used by the individuals.
Conclusion
The Paleolithic era people have made many artifacts that have triggered an archeological controversy in the academic and research-based sectors of archeology. Some students such as Leroi-Gourhan and Lewis-Williams have attempted to correct the techniques and meaning provided to the artifacts of Paleolithic era. Other folks such as Halverson have taken a totally opposite way of describe that no symbolism and representations of deeper things, such as those associated with mythical, mysterious, or faith based shall be attracts from this sort of artifacts. The rational way may be to adopt a midsection course while developing an opinion about the significance of Paleolithic arts and culture by assuming that even though the early artifacts may have been the outcome of randomly cognitive development of human head in the Paleolithic era, the lateral development into the artistry and culture was not devoid of deeper symbolism. The arts and culture of Paleolithic era have helped the subsequent cultures of the world. A synthesis procedure that includes rational fights of equally positions may well provide a plausible understanding of significant of Paleolithic era’s disciplines and culture.
Works Mentioned
Halverson, Steve, et al. “Art intended for Art’s Sake in the Paleolithic [and Comments and Reply]. ” Current Anthropology 28. 1 (1987): 63-89.
Leroi-Gourhan, Andre. “The advancement of Paleolithic art. inch Scientific American 218 (1968): 58-70.
Lewis-Williams, J. David, et ing. “The Signs of All Instances: Entoptic Trends in Upper Paleolithic Artwork [and Comments and Reply]. ” Current Anthropology 29. a couple of (1988): 201-245.
Pfeiffer, J. E. (1985). The breakthrough of humankind (p. 38). New York: Harper Row.
Shea, John L. “Spear details from the Central Paleolithic of
