The poet explores the relationship among cultural id and dialect. When you speak a language you also learn its traditions. Lines 19 and twenty sum up the theme. Which in turn language has not been the oppressor’s tongue? When another country is the conquerer, that region brings the language and culture to the people who happen to be conquered.
‘A Different History’ is in two linked parts: lines 1-18, then lines 19-29. The first stanza draws the web link between european and Indian culture because Pan, the Greek the almighty also is available through Of india gods and goddesses that roam readily.
She highlights the difference too in the way Indians treat catalogs with very much respect, to be able not to bother or offend Sarasvati or perhaps the tree that the newspaper comes. Stanza 2 comes back to the idea of a foreign dialect; all dialects, it says, have once been the language of an invader or a great oppressor, although despite this generally there always comes a time the moment younger and newer generations not only speak the oppressor’s language but they actually come to enjoy it.
DEVELOP (Tone means the attitude of the poet)
At first the tone is important of the culture of the west (e. g. the way the western world does not demonstrate respect for books). Later the tone is taking. She says that once people include assimilated the newest culture, the later ages love the language and tradition.
The composition is broken into two stanzas with every single dealing with a different idea on language and culture. The visual agreement of lines differ in the two stanzas. In stanza 1, the various indented lines give a wavy appearance to suggest perhaps the idea of gods roaming freely and to meet the humour in the stanza.
The second stanza has each of the lines indented similarly since the author delivers the serious communication that all ‘languages’ are imposed by the oppressor.
The tempo matches the content. The enjambment (run-on lines) in stanza 1 gives a light-hearted, stumbling rhythm. In stanza 2, the tempo is insistent as the poet uses rhetorical questions plus the mood turns serious.
POINT: Stanza 1 starts by evaluating the Ancient greek and American indian gods. Following the poem focuses on the reverential frame of mind towards catalogs in India.
Wonderful Pan is usually not useless; he simply emigrated To India| Meaning- Pan the Greek god of mother nature also is present in India. The effect is the fact cross-cultural links happen. | Here, the gods roam freely Disguised as dogs or monkeys | The poet identifies Indian gods in the form of dogs or apes. | And it is a sinto be irritating to a book(repeated 4 times) | By repeating ‘it is a sin’ the effect features persuasion and emphasis. Replication in a design of 3 or more is actually a persuasive unit. She uses strong words and phrases ‘shove’, ‘slam’, ‘toss’ to stress that ill-treating books is sinful to the Indians since they have a reverence for understanding. | You should learn how to switch the web pages gentlywithout distressing Sarasvati, devoid of offending the treefrom whose wood the paper was made|
The phrase ‘without’ is usually repeated for emphasis. In India, ebooks are taken care of carefully ‘gently’ to show admiration for Sarasvati, the Indio goddess expertise, and for the trees in which the gods happen to be. | *Pan- In Traditional religion and mythology, Skillet is the the almighty of the outrageous, shepherds and flocks, mountains, hunting Sarasvati ” the Hindu empress of Knowledge presides over the artistry and is usually worshipped in libraries.
STAGE: Stanza two the poet person states that many while every language comes from the conquering nations which is at first resisted, it is after embraced by future generations.
Which language is actually not the oppressor’s tongue? | This rhetorical question ( a question it does not need an answer because the response isobvious) provides the main concept of the composition ” most languages possess once been the language of an invader or perhaps an oppressor. | Which language Really meant to killing someone? | The repeating ‘which language’ is another rhetorical question which does not need a response as it is clear that terminology does not intentionally kill persons. | any time the pain, after the heart has been croppedwith a long scythe swooping from the conqueror’s face-| The poet now explains that it is the soul or perhaps the culture that is destroyed by conqueror.
The metaphor from the ‘long scythe swooping out’ is an image of the challenging destruction of the culture from the oppressed and replacing it with the tradition of the conqueror. | the unborn grandchildrengrow to like that peculiar language| The poet argues that actually over various generations, the oppressed people come circular to speaking the conqueror’s language and what is more to embracing the culture. Your woman points out the irony of history. |
one particularGet your custom Essay